AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Cnn breaking news now12/29/2023 This war mentality is key when dealing with threats that are not boots on the ground, but are just as aggressive and exist in places that are harder to see. Peter Caddick-Adams, a former official NATO historian, explains that it is extremely difficult for nations not currently at war to behave as though they are. To those working in these areas, it came as no surprise that Russia had been so successful interfering in the elections of other nations or that China had so successfully spread disinformation in Western countries during the pandemic. This inertia has also held back the West’s ability to deal with cyber and non-conventional threats from adversaries, including Russia and China. But in reality, there was no stipulation on what that 2% – even if they reached that threshold – was spent on, so it was never an indication of how prepared or useful they might be,” Giles added. Over time, cynical countries who didn’t feel at risk pointed to the spending of 2% to claim that they were doing enough on defense. “Spending 2% of GDP on defence was supposed to be a baseline – the minimum credible level of defence budget. “Countries far away from invasion themselves felt that distance would lead security, and they could continue to ignore the growing urgency of investment in hard security,” said Keir Giles, a senior fellow at the London-based Chatham House think tank. Stoltenberg increasingly likely to be asked to stay on as NATO chief, sources sayĪ common explanation as to why this happened is that in the post-Soviet era, Western countries became complacent, feeling that they had won the Cold War. And there’s definitely a percentage of our population that falls for this kind of disinformation,” van Weel said. And although we’ve been debunking that for years, you see that this keeps coming back. “Russia claims that NATO promised never to expand to the east after the dissolution of the Soviet Union. Those weapons are not only aimed at the target, in this case Ukraine. You can put a gun to their head, you can blackmail them, you can spread disinformation to turn others against them or you can turn off the energy to their house,” David van Weel, NATO’s Assistant Secretary General for Emerging Security Challenges, told CNN. “A weapon, by its broadest definition, is something that you can use to coerce someone into doing what you want them to do. Since the start of the war, disinformation, energy restrictions and cyberattacks on infrastructure have all been weaponized by the Kremlin to justify and advance its war. Even before the invasion, NATO officials noted a rise in non-conventional warfare aimed at Ukraine and other Western targets. Russia’s aggression hasn’t been restricted to the battlefield. Not bad for an organization France’s President Emmanuel Macron warned in 2019 was facing “brain death.” That has meant sending conventional military hardware – tanks, missile systems, artillery – and training Ukrainian soldiers. Ever since President Vladimir Putin gave the order for Russian troops to invade Ukraine, the international response has understandably focused on how best to end the land war.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |